Theoretical Development For The Photon Mass and The Quantization of The Gravitational Field

By Michael Harney

First published in Journal of Theoretics, Vol. 5-6

mharney@signaldisplay.com

 

 

One of the implications of the Special Theory of Relativity is the concept of a massless photon. A massless photon seems to be required by Special Relativity as a photon of any mass would have to be infinite based on the mass-transformation equations where it's velocity is equal to c and the function is then undefined. The problem with a massless photon arises in describing the photon as a particle with angular momentum and spin, not to mention its interaction with a gravitational field. All of these concepts are dealt with at an energy level and the familiar formula E = h*frequency is used as a substitution when mass is required in the classical formulas, with energy being related through the photon's momentum, E = momentum*c.

It was shown in 1998 from the Super-Kamiokande experiment that neutrinos generated from cosmic rays in the upper atmosphere can oscillate between muon and electron types with a mass for the neutrino being inferred, showing that there is interest in finding a mass for formerly massless particles.

In the following sections we will show a derivation for Hubble’s constant from Mach's Principle as it applies to potential energy and also from matter-wave equations that assume the photon has a mass, which we also predict from this equation as 5.81 x 10-69 Kg, which closely matches an estimate found by JP Vigier after analyzing a small ether drift in the Michelson-Morley experiment that was considered experimental error for many years [4]. Hubble’s constant from both the matter wave and energy equations is quite close to the actual value, with the matter wave equation giving the closest match to the current estimated value of 70 Km/sec/Mpsec. We also find a relationship by setting Hubble’s constant equal in both matter wave and energy equations and this leads to the quantization of the gravitational field through Planck’s constant.

First for the energy model and following Mach's Principle, let us assume an object in the Universe with rest mass m0 and the entire mass of the Universe is acting on this object gravitationally, so that the gravitational potential energy of all objects in the Universe acting on this single rest mass is found by integrating Newton's force law over the radius of the Universe to obtain,

G*(Mass of Universe)*m0 /(radius of Universe) = m0*c2,

equation 1

From this relation of the gravitational potential energy of the mass of the Universe acting on one object we see immediately that the rest mass cancels from both sides and the speed of light is in fact dependent upon the gravitational constant, the mass of the Universe and the radius of the Universe. Of these three factors, the radius of the Universe is the one assumed most likely to change over time and this formula shows that the speed of light is changing very slowly relative to our own time frame. If we choose a density for the Universe of 5 x 10-27 Kg/m3 [2], and assume a spherical shape then the mass of the Universe is calculated as the density * volume with radius of the Universe equal to 1.9 x 1026 meters. The mass of the Universe is then found to be 1.44 x 1053 Kg. Substituting these values into equation 1, the speed of light c is calculated to be 2.25 x 108 m/sec, close to the actual value and within the same order of magnitude. This isn't too bad considering that we are speculating on the mass and radius of the Universe from statistical density data, assumed spherical shape.

The conclusion from equation 1 is that the speed of light will decrease slowly as the Universe expands. In fact, if we rearrange equation 1 so that c is set in terms of R we have,

c = [G*Mass-Universe/R]1/2 equation 2

and differentiating c with respect to R gives us,

dc/dR = -1/2*[(G*Mass-Universe)1/2]*R-3/2 equation 3

and with the known expansion rate of the Universe being 3 x 108 m/sec = c (from Hubble’s formula v = H*R and substituting the radius of the Universe to find v=c) we can find the rate of change in the speed of light using the chain rule as follows: dc/dt = dc/dR*dR/dt (dR/dt is the expansion rate of the Universe equal to c which we are allowing to be a variable as we assume it is changing) or,

dc/dt = -1/2*[(G*Mass-Universe)1/2]*c*R-3/2 equation 4

Which is a differential equation of the first order in terms of c with a solution of:

c(t) = k1*[e (-k2*t)] equation 5

Which shows the exponential decay of the speed of light with time variable t. The constant k1 is a constant of integration and decay-constant k2 has the following value:

k2 = 1/2*[(G*Mass-Universe)1/2]*R-3/2 equation 6

= Hubble’s constant of

0.59 x 10-18 seconds-1

Or 18.2 Km/sec/Mpsec

So after substituting mass and radius quantities already discussed from equation 1 we find that the decay constant for the speed of light is Hubble’s constant (the value from equation 6 is about ¼ the current estimated value but within the same order of magnitude). As the speed of light with respect to time depends on Hubble’s constant, and we use the speed of light to verify this constant (through Doppler redshift) it may be possible that these factors result in the ambiguity of the measured value of Hubble’s constant. It does seem clear however, that the decay in the speed of light is controlled by the expansion rate of the Universe.

The integration constant k1 can be found in equation 5 by using the current value for the speed of light as c(t) = 3 x 108 m/sec, using Hubble’s constant for k2 and assuming an age for the Universe for the time variable (the hard part). After differentiating equation 5 we have,

dc/dt = -k1*k2*[e (-k2*t)] equation 7

 

Two points are noted from equations 1 through 7 as follows: 1) the speed of light is decreasing exponentially over time, and 2) equation 7 implies a deceleration of light, which in turn suggests a photon mass (if equation 1 is rewritten as Newton's Force law on the rest mass of the photon, dc/dt is the acceleration in F=ma, and the same numerical value results). This suggests that the mass of the photon is based on a factor involved in the expansion of the Universe. As equation 6 results in such a small decay constant (Hubble’s constant) for the speed of light and these values are hard to determine exactly, the values in equation 6 need to be evaluated properly for a correct value of dc/dt and slight measurements on the change in the speed of light are being investigated [3].

Based on equation 5 and knowing the current value of c = 3 x 108 m/sec, we can estimate that at t = 0 (early stages of the Universe), c = 2.7 * 2.7 * 3 x 108 m/sec = 22 x 108 m/sec. This higher value of c in the early Universe may explain the puzzling phenomena of superluminal objects traveling in many cases at twice the current speed of light. Although many explanations for their higher speed focus on measurement techniques, some of these objects may be far enough away from us and have existed at an earlier time in the Universe when c was a much higher value.

If we accept that Mach’s Principle is correct and that gravitational potential energy is equivalent to rest-mass energy, we may ask how this relationship and the decay of the speed of light affect the Lorentz transformations? If we examine an equation similiar to equation 1 where the gravitational potential energy of the Universe is acting on an accelerating object at velocity v, [G*(Mass of Universe)*m0 / (R= radius of Universe)] = m0*v2 as v approaches c. Rewriting the gravitational potential energy on the left side as the total rest-mass energy of the Universe (which is also the limit to how much energy can be used to accelerate an object), (Mass of Universe)* c2 = m0*v2 in the limit as v approaches c, m0 approaches the Mass of the Universe. Thus, we would expect that as objects approach the speed of light, their mass approaches the incredibly large value of 1.44 x 1053 Kg. Although Special Relativity tells us that m0 goes to infinity as v approaches c, our current instruments probably can’t tell the difference between infinity and 1.44 x 1053 unless m0 is very large to begin with. If m0 is very large then the ratio Mass-Universe / m0 may be more measurable.

Next, let’s revisit matter waves as described by Debroglie in 1924. From the knowledge of light having particle-like properties, Debroglie drew the conclusion that matter should have wave-like properties and assigned the formula (again using the energy relation of E = h*frequency and incorporating momentum):

Matter-wavelength of particle = h / (mass-particle * velocity-particle)

equation 8

where h = Planck's constant of 6.62 x 10-34 Joules*sec

It has been shown in the Bohr model of the atom that the stability of electronic orbits is obtained by requiring an integral number of matter-wavelengths of the electron to equal the circumference of each orbit. This ensures stability of each electronic orbit in the Bohr model of the atom, and we will apply this same principle to the matter-wavelength of a photon and the diameter of the Universe.

We then set the matter-wavelength of a photon equal to the diameter of the Universe (assuming perhaps that the Universe is still radiation-dominated with the majority of photons travelling at velocity c through free-space),

Diameter of Universe = h / (mass-photon * speed of light), equation 9

From equation 9, we can then state,

2 x 1.9 x 1026 meters = h / (mass-photon * speed of light), equation 10

 

 

For the speed of light we use c = 3 x 108 m/sec and we find the mass of the photon as

Mass-photon = 5.81 x 10-69 Kg or 3.23 x 10-33 eV

 

This value for photon mass closely matches an estimate determined by JP Vigier after analyzing the results of the Michelson-Morley experiment more closely [4]. The Michelson-Morley experimental data shows a small ether drift of 8 Km/sec which is periodic with the rotation of the Earth, showing that it is statistically significant. The introduction of a small photon mass of 10-68 Kg removes this drift and the absolute reference frame that is tied to it. The introduction of this photon mass using the Einstein-DeBroglie relation re-establishes a relativistic explanation for the experiment. If we now take equation 9 and rearrange the c term with the Diameter term ( = 2 * Radius):

Speed of Light = c = h / (mass-photon * R * 2), equation 11

Where R = radius of Universe

Then we can take the derivative, dc/dR as we performed for the energy relationship in equation 3,

dc/dR = - h / (2 * mass-photon * R2), equation 12

We then use the chain rule again, dc/dt = dc/dR * dR/dt and use dR/dt = c = 3 x 108 m/sec to form the first-order differential equation,

 

dc/dt = - k2*dR/dt = - k2*c, equation 13

 

with k2 = h / (2 * mass-photon * R2), equation 14

and using values of R = 1.9 x 1026 meters, mass-photon = 5.81 x 10-69 Kg, h = Planck’s constant we find,

k2 = Hubble’s constant of 1.57 x 10-18 seconds-1

Or 48.4 Km/sec/Mpsec

Compare the value of Hubble’s constant calculated in equation 14 with that of equation 6. The value found by using matter-wavelength relationships is a little more than twice the value from energy relationships.

The solution to equation 13 is similar to that of equation 5, as both are first-order differentials:

c(t) = k1*[e (-k2*t)] , equation 15

with k1 being a constant of integration and k2 as determined from equation 14.

As k2 from equation 14 is about twice the value of k2 determined from energy relationships in equation 6 (and both are sufficiently large), k1 from equation 15 will also be close to the value of k1 in equation 5 (determined by using a known value of c, current time since expansion t, and k2 in equation 15 – estimating t = 1/k2). Therefore, dc/dt as determined by taking the derivative of equation 15,

dc/dt = -k1*k2*[e (-k2*t)], equation 16

gives the value for dc/dt

We can also set equation 14 equal to approximately twice equation 6:

k2 = h / (2 * mass-photon * R2) = 2 * 1/2*[(G*Mass-Universe)1/2]*R-3/2

equation 17

From equation 17 we can solve for G, the gravitational constant,

G = [h / (2 * mass-photon * R1/2)]2 * (Mass-Universe)-1

= 1.2 x 10-10

equation 18

Compared to the traditional value for G of 6.67 x 10-11, the results of equation 18 are about twice this value.

It can also be shown by manipulation of equation 17 that,

G * Mass-Universe / R = [h / (2 * mass-photon)]2, equation 19

Or that the potential energy of the mass of the Universe on any object is a function of Planck’s constant and the mass of the photon.

And based on equation 19, we can quantize gravitational potential energy levels as follows:

G * Mass-Universe / (n2 * R) = [h / (2 * n * mass-photon)]2, equation 20

Where n goes from 1 to 1061 which is actually the limit based on Planck Length - see (Defining Gravity With DeBroglie Waves).

 

 

The derivation of Hubble’s constant has been shown by using concepts of Newtonian Mechanics and Special Relativity (gravitational potential energy = rest-mass energy), and from Quantum Mechanics (matter-wavelength formula) and by assuming in the derivation a change in the speed of light as the radius of the Universe increases. A very close match to the measured Hubble’s constant was found in both cases and a decay rate for the speed of light was determined to be the same by both cases. By setting the equations for Hubble’s constant in both energy and matter-wave forms equal to each other, a relationship between gravitational potential energy and Planck’s constant is found, resulting in the quantization of the gravitational field.

It is hoped that the developments in this paper will inspire investigations into the speed of light decay and measurment of gravitational potential energy at quantized levels. The predicted mass of the photon as suggested herein is also cause for more investigation, as current upper limits on the photon’s mass are still above the predicted value by a factor of about 1010. For the follow on paper in this series, visit (Defining Gravity With DeBroglie Waves).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

1. Introductory Astronomy and Astrophysics, Zeilik & Smith, Saunders College Publishing, 1987. p. 432

2. Introductory Astronomy and Astrophysics, Zeilik & Smith, Saunders College Publishing, 1987. p. 435

3. Troitskii, V.S. "Physical Constants and the evolution of the Universe" Astrophysics and Space Science v139 p389-411 1987.

4. Vigier, J.P. "Relativistic Interpretation (with Non-Zero Photon Mass) of the Small Ether Drift Velocity Detected by Michelson, Morley, and Miller", APEIRON Vol.4 Nr.2-3, pp.71-76, Apr.-Jul 1997.

The Gravitational Force as Defined by DeBroglie Waves

The Gravitational Force as Defined by DeBroglie Waves

© 2003 By Michael Harney

 

 

Abstract: The energy in DeBroglie Waves is shown to be equivalent to gravitational potential energy. By solving Schrodinger’s equation for a photon trapped in a hypothetical two-dimensional universe, the solution to all allowable rest-energies for every particle from the mass of the photon up to the mass of the universe is found. The quantum numbers that predict the allowable rest-energies of every particle are also found to quantize the distance over which gravity acts, ranging from the Planck length to the radius of the universe.

 

 

I. Equivalence Between DeBroglie Waves and Rest-Energy

It has been shown in "Derivation of Hubble’s Constant and the Quantization of the Gravitational Field" and from Mach’s principle that the rest-energy of any object is equivalent to the universal gravitational potential energy acting on that object [1]. It can also be shown that one simplified quantization scheme for the gravitational field starts by assuming the photon is a standing matter-wave of fundamental wavelength in a two-dimensionsal box (more on this simplification later) with dimensions equal to twice the radius of the universe. In this process, we solve Schrodinger’s equation for this problem and find a solution for all allowable energies that the particle can have as follows [2]:

 

E = [(nx)2 + (ny)2 ]p 2h2/(2mL2) ,(1)

 

Where nx and ny are the quantum numbers, m is the mass of the particle, L is the length of the box or in this case, twice the radius of the universe (with the radius being equal to 1.9 x 1026 meters), and h is Planck’s constant of 6.62 x 10-34 Joules-sec. By setting nx and ny equal to 1, and L equal to twice the radius of the universe, we obtain the ground state energy of a particle of fundamental matter-wavelength inside the universe which we assume to be the photon, mp. We then set the ground-state energy of the photon’s matter-wave equal to its rest-energy,

 

2p 2h2/(2mpL2) = mpc2 ,(2)

By substituting L = 2r where r = 1.9 x 1026 meters we find the mass of the photon to be:

mp = [2p 2h2/(2(2r)2c2)]1/2 = 1.8 x 10-68 kg ,(3)

This value for photon mass closely matches an estimate proposed by JP Vigier in an analyis of what was considered experimental error in the Michelson-Morley experiment [5]. The Michelson-Morley experiment actually yielded a small ether drift of 8 Km/sec that was much smaller than the expected 320 Km/sec and the small drift was attributed to experimental error. An analysis of the data by Morley and others however, has shown that the "error" is periodic with respect to the rotation of the Earth and it’s periodicity is verified in other multiple experiments. Vigier has proposed a photon mass of 10-68 Kg from the Einstein-DeBroglie relation that will offset the ether drift of 8 Km/sec and restore a relativistic outcome for the experiment (otherwise, the ether drift indicates an absolute reference frame).

 

II. Quantization of Mass and the Gravitational Field

The underlying principle that is used for the above derivation of (2) and (3) is that rest-mass energy is equivalent to quantum well energy and we have shown from [1] that Universal gravitational potential energy (UGPE) is equivalent to rest-mass energy so quantum-well energy is then equivalent to UGPE, which allows us to quantize the gravitational field as follows:

[(nx)2 + (ny)2 ] p 2h2/(2mL2) = m MuG / r ,(4)

Where r = radius of universe, Mu = mass of universe (1.44 x 1053 Kg), and m = mass of object

For any particle with mass m, there is a formula for the quantization of mass due to equations 1 and 2 as follows,

m = [((nx)2 + (ny)2 ) p 2h2/(2(2r)2c2)]1/2 ,(5)

 

Where, for the photon the quantum numbers are 1 as we have just shown and for all other particles the quantum numbers are greater than 1. For the highest known mass, the mass of the universe, we solve for the combination of ((nx)2 + (ny)2) by taking a ratio of two equations modeled after (4). By leaving the quantum numbers as variables in the numerator for the mass of the universe and setting them equal to 1 in the denominator for the mass of the photon (with all but quantum numbers cancelling on the left hand side),

((nx)2 + (ny)2) = Muc2/ mpc2 ,(6)

Where Mu = Mass of universe and mp = mass of photon

 

 

Or ((nx)2 + (ny)2) = 10122

And the effective quantum number (neff, the quantum number of the same order of manitude as either nx or ny) is,

neff = [((nx)2 + (ny)2)]1/2 = 1061 ,(7)

The physical interpretation of these results is that rest-energy (and hence rest-mass, because c cancels from numerator and denominator in (6)) is quantized and can assume only certain values. Likewise, a particle of higher mass than the photon will have a higher neff. Also, neff is the wave number from the solution to Schrodinger’s equation for the probability density function. For neff = 1, the probability density function assumes a half-sine function with a peak amplitude at r = 0, or the center of the universe [3].

Likewise, a particle of higher mass than the photon will have a higher neff, which corresponds to a shorter DeBroglie wavelength, which for the standing waves that we have assumed in (1) are given by

l = 2L/n, ,(8)

where L = 2(radius of universe). This last development corresponds directly with Heisenberg’s Uncertainty principle,

(D E)D t = h ,(9)

Where D E is found from (1) as,

D E = (D neff)2 p 2h2/(2mL2) ,(10)

and D t = D l /c ,(11)

 

where c = speed of light and D l is found by differentiating (8) with respect to n:

D l = -4L/(D neff)2 ,(12)

Therefore, combining (10), (11) and (12) and recognizing L = 2r,

(D E)D t = [(D neff)2 p 2h2/(2mL2)][ -4L/c(D neff)2] ,(13)

= h2/(mrc)

where m = mass of photon = 1.8 x 10-68 kg, r = radius of universe, 1.9 x 1026 meters, c = speed of light and,

(D E)D t = p 2h2/(mrc) = 6 x 10-34 Jsec = h ,(14)

This shows that an increase in energy (by increasing mass as in (10)) causes a decrease in D t (12), which makes (D E)D t constant. Therefore, Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle is derived from assuming a standing wave formula for all masses (with n = 1 corresponding to l = r) and applying Schrodinger’s equation to calculate the energies in the standing waves. A photon has the lowest location resolution and the highest momentum resolution (it’s mass and velocity being known very precisely). The low-resolution of photon location (let’s call it non-locality) may explain photon entanglement, where photon’s initially linked by metastable quantum states are capable of non-local communication.

As an object approaches the speed of light and it’s relativistic energy approaches Muc2, it’s neff approaches 1061 and it’s matter-wavelength is reduced. This may be where the Planck length is most commonly noticed – as a limiting factor on neff which in turn limits the velocity that an object can attain as it approaches the speed of light.

 

III. Particle Interactions in the Quantized Field

Now we examine how quantization affects the vector particles and their ranges for the four forces. The Planck length is defined as,

Lp = [(hG)/(2p c3)]1/2 ,(15)

Therefore,

Lp = 1.616 x 10-35 meters

Where the constants have been previously evaluated [4].

By knowing that the radius of the universe, ru is 1.9 x 1026 meters and knowing that the Planck length is the minimum distance the gravitational force can act over we find that,

(ru)/ (Lp) = neff = 1061 ,(16)

Therefore, the maximum quantum number (neff = 1061) that corresponds to the ratio of the maximum to minimum rest-masses in the universe is also equal to the ratio of maximum to minimum radii that the gravitational force acts over. By incorporating (6) and (16) together we find,

GMu/ru2 = Gmp/Lp2 ,(17)

Or that the gravitational force due the Mass of the universe acting on an object over the radius of the universe is equal to a photon’s gravitational pull on the same object acting over the distance of the Planck length. This simply states that the electromagnetic force and its vector particle the photon has the same mass/range relationship on its minimum scale (Planck Length) as the gravitational force has over its maximum scale (mass of universe, radius of universe). It is also interesting to note that the relationship in (17) applies to the strong nuclear force as well:

GMu/ru2 = Gmpi-meson/ rstrong 2 ,(18)

Where mpi-meson = 139.6 MeV and rstrong is the distance the strong-nuclear force acts over (or the maximum nuclear radius), which after solving (18) we find

rstrong = 7.88 x 10-15 meters,

which is the typically the maximum nuclear radii and the range over which the pi-meson acts in strong interactions. For the weak nuclear force, which has a generally accepted range of 10-18 meters and using the constant evaluated in (17), the estimated mass of the vector particle (which is mostly likely the electron-neutrino) is 4 x 10-36 Kg or 2.2 eV/c2.

Based on (2) where we assume that the rest-mass energy of a particle is equivalent to it’s quantum-well energy we formulate the conclusion that a particle can be viewed as a series of standing-wave ripples in the fabric of space-time, where the amplitude of the ripple is mc2 and this amplitude is also the vector axis of particle motion. The cartesian-coordinates that are normal to the particle’s axis of motion correspond to the DeBroglie wave vectors specified by nx, ny and L in (1). Also, as we have calculated a mass for the photon in (3) and assigned n=1 to it’s DeBroglie wave while it travels at free-space velocity, we know that it’s E and H vectors are normal to it’s direction of propogation and therefore the E and H fields are mapped into the same plane as it’s DeBroglie waves. The amplitude of the photon’s DeBroglie waves are found to be mpc2 which is also equivalent to it’s UGPE as defined by (4), which allows for future derivations between the gravitational field and the electromagnetic fields.

If the particle is thought of as a ripple in this space-time fabric, then classical mechanics should apply to this fabric. If we take a simple approach of using Hooke’s law for an elastic medium, then the energy stored in a compression or tension of space-time fabric is:

E = ½kD r2 ,(19)

Where D r is the change in distance due to compression or tension (which in turn is the distance between objects in the fabric of space-time) and k is the elasticity constant. But this compression or tension translates into changes in rest-mass energy,

E = mc2 ,(20)

So combining (19) and (20),

½k/c2 = m/D r2 ,(21)

The term m/D r2 has been found from (17) and (18) above to be a constant for the range of particles and forces in their limited or extreme case and when combined with (21) yield,

k = 7.18 x 1017 Newtons/meter ,(22)

 

As (21) is based on the integration of Hooke’s force law, it should also be true that F = kx, which is the force of compression or tension in the spacetime fabric and we find that this is the case for the boundary condition of x = radius of universe as follows:

F = kRu = G(MuMu)/[(Ru)2] ,(23)

Where Mu is mass of universe, Ru is radius of universe and k = 7.18 x1017 as found above. Equation (23) simply states that the force due to the mass of the universe (Mu) acting on itself over its own radius is equal to k multiplied by a space-time displacement. This space-time displacement is then equal to the radius of the universe. This is the overall stretching force of the universe corresponding to its mass and it produces a pulling force that can produce standing-wave ripples (whose amplitude is the rest energy, mc2 of a particle) in the fabric of spacetime. For any material of mass/unit-length u, where we introduce a force along one axis in the material we get waves of speed v as follows:

v = (F/u)1/2 ,(24)

We know from (23) that F = kRu for the universal tension and we know the mass of the mass per unit length of the universe as Mu/Ru so (24) becomes

v = (kRu2 / Mu)1/2 ,(25)

For Ru = radius of universe, Mu as mass of universe and k as found above it is shown that v = c, showing that the speed of a wave in the space-time fabric produced by the universal tensile force in (23) is equal to the speed of light. Note that v is not the speed of the mass itself but rather the speed of its Debroglie wave which we assume travels in the plane normal to the particle’s velocity vector. We assume this because the rest-energy of the particle can be set equal to the quantized energy in a two-dimensional quantum well and then the relation in (21) is derived. This then defines the rest-energy of the particle from its mass as mc2 which is based on the energy in its Debroglie wave, which is proportional to v2 when v = c. The particle may be moving at some speed and this produces separate, non-standing DeBroglie waves based on the particle’s speed but in (24) we propose that standing DeBroglie waves normal to the velocity vector is what defines the rest energy of the particle. This is consistent with the definition of mass as an inertial quantity that is resistant to force, where all force vectors can be replaced with one resultant vector that is valid in only one axis. Hence, our model for mass (which we define as the amplitude of standing DeBroglie waves) is valid in only one dimension (while the other two dimensions define the plane of DeBroglie wave propagation).

From (25) we know that the upper limit for v is c and this corresponds to a tensile force equivalent to the mass of the universe, therefore smaller masses will exhibit a force that is smaller than (23). If we take a given mass of say, 106 Kg and calculate from (21) what the displacement x is (knowing k from above) we find x = 500.6 meters. This is the average stretch in spacetime that corresponds to this mass and because the force is smaller than in (23) we expect the velocity of the DeBroglie waves to be smaller than c which will amount to time-dilation effects at distance x from the gravitational source. When we substitute x = 500.6 meters into (25) in place of Ru we find v = 0.73 cm/sec, which is the velocity component of the DeBroglie waves moving towards the mass in the quantum foam at 500.6 meters from the center of the mass. There is also the pull on the DeBroglie waves from the remaining mass in the universe (kRu) which is similiar to Mach's principle, and results in a velocity of c in a radial direction away from the mass. The net velocity is obiously c - 0.73 cm/sec which is very close to c.

The time dilation effects result from the displacement of the deBroglie waves as they travel relative to c. When we take the ratio of the inward radial velocity (toward the mass source) to the velocity c that results from universal pull (kRu) for the given example we find v/c = 2.43 x 10-12 and

(v/c)2 = 5.90 x 10-24 ,(26)

In general relativity the time dilation at a distance R from the center of the gravitational source M is

T = T0 / (1-2GM/(Rc2))1/2 ,(27)

For the mass of 106 Kg and R = x = 500.6 meters , 2GM/(Rc2) = 2.96 x 10-24 = (1/2)(v/c)2 where (v/c)2 is found from (26). Therefore, the time dilation formula of (27) when combined with the DeBroglie velocity waves of (26) and (25) becomes,

T = T0 / (1-.5(v/c)2)1/2 ,(28)

which excluding the factor of 0.5 which may be an averaging effect, is the standard Lorentz transformation for time dilation of a mass moving at velocity v. So we find the time dilation effects due to general relativity (27) are essentially the same as those of special relativity (28), when the velocity of DeBroglie waves are considered. Although we used a specific mass for this example of m = 106 Kg, it can be shown in general by combining (25) and (21), and substituting x = R that

0.5(v/c)2 = 2GM/(Rc2) ,(29)

 

We know from (25) that the velocity of the DeBroglie waves under universal tension is a function of Ru:

v = c = Ru (k / Mu)1/2 ,(30)

We also know that Ru is increasing as a function of time so v depending upon the sign taken for (k / Mu)1/2 , we know v must be increasing or decreasing as a function of time. From previous analysis by this author[1] it was shown that the speed of light is decreasing as function of time by a similar relationship as in (30). Therefore, we take the sign as negative and the derivative of (30) shows:

dc/dt = -[(k / Mu)1/2] (dRu/dt) ,(31)

and because dRu/dt = c,

dc/dt = -[(k / Mu)1/2]c ,(32)

We can write the solution to this differential equation of the first order as:

c(t) = c(0)e(-Ht) ,(33)

where

H = [(k / Mu)1/2] = Hubble’s constant of 2.23 x 1018 sec -1 which is consistent with the results found in the previous analysis of c-decay[1].

 

 

 

 

  1. Conclusions

The quantization of mass and gravitational fields can be interpreted by viewing these particles or fields as standing DeBroglie waves in a space-time fabric. The potential energy in this fabric is equivalent to the rest-energy of particles and the potential energy of gravitational fields. The standing DeBroglie waves of a particle are projected in two-dimensions normal to the axis of motion of the particle. The E and H vectors of electromagnetic fields are mapped into the same plane as the DeBroglie waves, with interaction occuring as energy displacement inside the space-time fabric. By applying Schrodinger’s equation to this standing wave with the two-dimensional plane that it is in, the mass of particles can be interpreted from the quantized energy of the waves.

 

 

 

 

 

References

[1] Harney, Michael. "Derivation of Hubble’s Constant and the Quantization of the Gravitational Field", Journal of Theoretics Vol. 5-6 Dec. 2003/Jan. 2004.

[2] Modern Physics, Kenneth Krane, John Wiley & Sons, 1983. p. 129.

[3] Introductory Astronomy and Astrophysics, Zeilik & Smith, Saunders College Publishing, 1987. p. 436.

[4] Ellman, Roger. "A New Analysis of Gravitation and the Planck Length", Journal of Theoretics Vol 5-5 Oct-Nov 2003.

[5] Vigier, J.P. "Relativistic Interpretation (with Non-Zero Photon Mass) of the Small Ether Drift Velocity Detected by Michelson, Morley, and Miller", APEIRON Vol.4 Nr.2-3, pp.71-76, Apr.-Jul 1997.